The Physics and Future of Cooling

Heat naturally flows across a temperature differential. Many devices (like those using fluid circulation, air circulation, and heat pipes) utilize or enhance this natural flow. However, these methods only move heat and cannot produce a temperature lower than the outlet temperature.

I differentiate this from an “active cooling” device, which does more than just move heat around. An active device can produce cooler temperatures than the ambient air. Its performance is measured by its Carnot efficiency, as these devices operate based on a Carnot cycle. Second Law of Thermodynamics: The Refrigerator

The Second Law of Thermodynamics, specifically the Clausius statement (the "second form"), states: It is not possible for heat to flow spontaneously from a colder body to a warmer body without work having been done to accomplish this flow. Energy will not flow spontaneously from a low temperature object to a higher temperature object. This principle precludes a perfect refrigerator. The same principles apply to air conditioners and heat pumps.

Source: hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu Physical Phenomena that can cause cooling

All devices that can cool below ambient temperature use one or more of these phenomena in conjunction with other effects to drive the cooling:

1. Expansion and Compression: Changing the pressure of solids, liquids, or gases.
2. Phase Change (Evaporation): Expansion from a phase change, usually from liquid to gas (e.g., evaporation). The Joule-Thomson effect is the basis for Freon refrigeration.
3. Crystal Structure Change: Changes in a crystal's structure caused by pressure, electric, or magnetic fields.
4. Magnetocaloric Effect: A change in the specific heat of a material caused by exposure to a magnetic field, often used in Adiabatic Demagnetization.
5. Thermoelectric Effect (Seebeck/Peltier): Heat transfer that occurs when electrons flow across two dissimilar materials.
6. Thermo Tunnel Effect: Uses electron quantum tunneling across a very small vacuum gap.
7. Thermionic Effect: Heat transfer from electrons "boiling" into a gas or vacuum.
8. Laser Cooling: Uses laser interference to kick out warm atoms; only works near absolute zero.
9. Nernst Effect: An electromotive force is observed perpendicular to the direction of heat flow and magnetic force lines. The Ettinghausen Effect is the reverse.
10. Maxwell's Demon: A theoretical abstraction involving a demon that separates hot and cold molecules.

Carnot Efficiencies for Selected Technologies:

• Peltier: 5%
• Compressor: 45%
• Thermo Tunnel Effect (Cool Chip): 55% theoretical
• Magnetic Cooling: 30% to 60%

---

Compressor-based Refrigeration

This method uses a piston compressor to compress a gas and then allows it to expand through a nozzle, which cools the gas.

Modern refrigerators use Freon, a CFC (carbon fluorine) gas that is non-toxic but damages the ozone layer. Other gasses like ammonia ($\text{NH}_3$), methyl chloride ($\text{CH}_3\text{Cl}$), and sulfur dioxide ($\text{SO}_2$) have been used but are flammable or poisonous.

---

Vortex Cooling

The Vortex Tube (discovered in 1930 by French physicist Georges Ranque) uses the compression and expansion of a gas, usually air. Ambient temperature air enters the middle of the Vortex Tube, and hot air comes out one end while cold air comes out the other.

---

The Thermoelectric Effect

When two wires of dissimilar metals are joined together at each end and the junctions are at different temperatures, a thermoelectric EMF is generated, causing a current to flow (the Seebeck effect, discovered in 1826).

The Peltier effect is the converse: an electric current flowing across the junction of two dissimilar metals either produces or absorbs heat, depending on the direction of the current.

---

Thermionic Effect

This effect is the engine of a vacuum tube. A heated metal (the cathode) releases electrons, which form a cloud around it. A current will flow to a second electrode (the anode or plate) if a battery is connected between the two. The heated metal is positively charged due to the loss of electrons.

---

Thermo Acoustic Cooling

Acoustic cooling uses a sound generator inside a closed tube to vibrate a gas, causing alternate compression and expansion, and therefore heating and cooling. Prototypes have shown lower efficiency than vapor compression systems and are physically large for the amount of cooling they produce. Pulse Tube Refrigeration

Pulse tube cooling is similar to acoustic cooling, but it uses a compressor instead of a sound generator to induce the oscillation and alternate compression and expansion of an inert gas in a tube.

---

Stirling Cycle

The Stirling refrigeration cycle compresses and expands an inert gas in a single cylinder. Heat is rejected at one end of the cylinder and absorbed at the opposite end. While the Coefficient of Performance (COP) should theoretically be higher than vapor compression systems, technical difficulties have limited its use, primarily to small prototype domestic refrigerators. It has no circulating refrigerant fluid, and the small heat areas create heat exchange difficulties, often requiring heat pipes. Malone Refrigeration

Malone refrigeration is a variant of the Stirling cycle that uses a liquid instead of an inert gas as the refrigeration medium.

Current research in America at Los Alamos Laboratories is exploring innovative cooling technologies, considering either the Brayton cycle or the Stirling cycle. The team’s prototype has been based on the Stirling cycle principle. Air Cycle Refrigeration

Air cycle refrigeration is a tried and tested technology, long used for aircraft cabin cooling. Historically, low energy efficiency and high cost prevented its use in buildings. However, recent studies suggest air cycle systems could be viable for buildings requiring simultaneous heating and cooling. Although they have low COPs, they can provide relatively high-temperature heat recovery without the efficiency penalty of vapor compression systems.

---

Magnetocaloric Materials and Magnetic Cooling

Magnetic cooling is based on the principle that a metal heats up when it is magnetized and cools when it is demagnetized. The technology offers several advantages over conventional gas compression cooling, including potentially higher efficiency, the elimination of ozone layer-depleting chemicals, and reduced noise and vibrations.

Currently, expensive and rare gadolinium is used for its good magnetocalorific properties. However, rare earth-based materials (like gadolinium) possess high magnetic entropy change ($\Delta S_M$) but have a very low potential for large-scale commercialization due to their limited availability, high cost, and poor corrosion resistance.

The search for affordable magnetocaloric materials for near room temperature applications has gained momentum. Iron and manganese based magnetocaloric materials (MCM) are promising alternatives. Low-cost and readily available Fe-based magnetic materials (such as Fe-Ni and $\text{Fe}_{17}\text{R}_2$ based nanoparticles) are particularly attractive for magnetic cooling applications. The development of iron and manganese-based MCM involves the study of their magnetic phase transitions, processing techniques, performance, and applications.

In terms of performance, a prototype 500-Watt system with a super-conducting magnet achieved a COP of over 5, surpassing an equivalent vapor compression system. Magnetic cooling is thought to achieve significantly higher energy efficiency than vapor compression systems, with some studies showing it can reach 60% of Carnot (ideal) efficiency, while the best gas compression systems reach only 40%. A magnetic refrigerator was successfully tested in 2001.

Sources:

• Ames Laboratory news release, Dec. 7, 2001
• V. Chaudhary and R.V. Ramanujan on Fe and Mn MCM

---

Sorption Refrigeration

This method uses cyclic heating and cooling with an absorbing material in a closed system to produce a cooling effect.

---

Other Cooling Methods

• Evaporative Cooling / Desiccant Cooling
• Elastic Refrigeration (Sokol Idea): Cooling from the stretching of an elastomer belt and heating when it contracts can be used to refrigerate. Some rubber-like materials act in reverse, heating when stretched and cooling when allowed to relax. This reverse effect could also be utilized.

The Untapped Power Beneath the Golden Gate Bridge

Exploring the Potential and Challenges of Tidal Energy in San Francisco Bay

Every day, an extraordinary natural phenomenon occurs beneath one of America's most iconic landmarks. As the tides ebb and flow through the Golden Gate Strait—that narrow, mile-wide channel connecting San Francisco Bay to the Pacific Ocean—massive volumes of water surge back and forth with remarkable force. This powerful movement represents not just a spectacular display of nature, but potentially one of the most significant untapped sources of renewable energy in the United States.

The Scale of Water Movement

The numbers involved are staggering. During each tidal cycle, approximately 390 billion gallons of water flows through the Golden Gate. This happens twice daily—once during flood tide (incoming) and once during ebb tide (outgoing)—meaning that roughly 780 billion gallons of water passes through the strait every 24 hours.

Note on your original figures: Your notes mentioned 117 billion gallons per day, which appears to be significantly underestimated. Multiple authoritative sources, including Bay Area research institutions and government studies, consistently cite approximately 390 billion gallons per tidal cycle, occurring twice daily.

This movement represents about 24% of the entire Bay's volume sloshing in and out with each tidal change. The narrowness of the Golden Gate creates a funneling effect that concentrates this enormous volume of water through a relatively small opening, generating powerful currents that make this location particularly attractive for tidal energy generation.

Current Velocities: Nature's Hydroelectric Engine

The speed at which water moves through the Golden Gate varies considerably throughout each tidal cycle. Average currents typically range from 3 to 4.8 knots (approximately 3.5 to 5.5 mph), with peak velocities reaching 6 knots or more (nearly 7 mph) during maximum ebb and flood tides, particularly during spring tides following new and full moons.

Several factors influence these velocities:

• Tidal stage: Peak currents occur roughly midway between slack water periods

• Lunar cycle: Currents are strongest during and shortly after full and new moons

• Seasonal rainfall: Winter storms can add 2-3 knots of current to predicted values

• Channel geometry: The deepest part of the strait reaches 377 feet, creating complex flow patterns

These velocities are significant because water is approximately 832 times denser than air, meaning that a relatively modest water current carries far more kinetic energy than a much faster wind. This density difference makes tidal energy potentially more efficient than wind energy on a power-per-square-meter basis.

The Energy Potential: Calculating the Promise

The theoretical potential for tidal energy generation at the Golden Gate is substantial, though estimates vary widely depending on assumptions about technology, placement, and efficiency. Your notes mentioned "several tens of gigawatts," which unfortunately represents a significant overestimation.

More realistic assessments from engineering studies suggest:

• Conservative estimates: 1,000-1,500 megawatts of potential generation capacity

• Optimistic projections: Up to 2,000 megawatts under ideal conditions

• Practical reality: Initial commercial projects would likely generate far less, potentially 30-100 megawatts

To put these numbers in context, San Francisco's peak power demand is approximately 800 megawatts. This means that, theoretically, a fully developed tidal energy system at the Golden Gate could meet and exceed the city's entire electricity needs, with surplus power available for export to other Bay Area communities.

The Hydroelectric Power Formula

Your notes included a power calculation formula that needs correction. The standard formula for hydroelectric power is:

P = ρ × g × Q × h × η

Where:

• P = Power output (watts)

• ρ = Density of water (1,025 kg/m³ for seawater)

• g = Gravitational acceleration (9.81 m/s²)

• Q = Flow rate (cubic meters per second)

• h = Head (height difference in meters)

• η = Efficiency (typically 0.4-0.8 for tidal turbines)

However, tidal energy at the Golden Gate doesn't rely on a significant height difference (head) like traditional hydroelectric dams. Instead, it harnesses the kinetic energy of moving water. The more appropriate formula for in-stream tidal energy is:

P = 0.5 × ρ × A × v³ × Cp

Where:

• A = Cross-sectional area of turbine (square meters)

• v = Velocity of water (meters per second)

• Cp = Power coefficient (maximum theoretical value is 0.59, practical values are 0.35-0.45)

This formula shows why current velocity is so critical—power output increases with the cube of velocity. Doubling the water speed increases potential power by a factor of eight.

The Vision and the Reality: A History of Ambition

The idea of harnessing tidal energy from San Francisco Bay has captivated engineers, entrepreneurs, and city leaders for decades. In the early 2000s, enthusiasm for the project reached a peak, with then-Mayor Gavin Newsom championing the concept as a cornerstone of the city's renewable energy future.

In 2006, a landmark study by the Electric Power Research Institute identified San Francisco Bay as "one of the world's most abundant potential resources for electricity generation using tidal power technology." This assessment sparked significant interest and investment. By 2007, the City of San Francisco, Pacific Gas & Electric Company, and a developer called Golden Gate Energy Company had committed nearly $1.9 million to comprehensive feasibility studies.

The proposed system would involve underwater turbines—essentially underwater windmills—installed on the seafloor beneath the Golden Gate Bridge. These turbines would spin as tidal currents flowed past them, generating electricity that could be transmitted to shore via undersea cables. The technology seemed promising: tidal energy is predictable (following tidal charts), consistent (tides occur regardless of weather), and clean (producing zero emissions).

Why It Hasn't Happened: The Sobering Challenges

Despite the enthusiasm and investment, no commercial tidal energy system has been built at the Golden Gate. The reasons are numerous and interconnected:

Economic Hurdles

The economics proved far more challenging than initially projected. A 2008 San Francisco Public Utilities Commission study found that:

• Individual turbines could cost up to $15 million each

• Annual maintenance costs could reach $750,000 per turbine

• A 1,000-megawatt system was estimated at $600 million total

• The technology was deemed not commercially feasible at current costs

While proponents argued that costs would average out to about 6 cents per kilowatt-hour over 30 years—comparable to natural gas—the massive upfront investment and ongoing maintenance costs were prohibitive, especially compared to rapidly declining costs for solar and wind energy.

Technical and Operational Challenges

The marine environment presents unique technical obstacles:

• Corrosion: Saltwater is highly corrosive to mechanical and electrical components

• Biofouling: Marine organisms colonize underwater structures, requiring constant cleaning

• Sediment: The Golden Gate has massive sand dunes up to 30 feet tall that migrate across the seafloor

• Installation depth: The strait is up to 377 feet deep, complicating installation and maintenance

• Variable conditions: Seasonal rainfall and storm surges can dramatically alter current patterns

• Shipping conflicts: The Golden Gate is a major shipping channel for one of the busiest ports on the West Coast

Environmental Concerns

San Francisco Bay is a complex estuarine ecosystem that supports diverse marine life, including:

• Fish species: Salmon, steelhead, herring, anchovies, and many others

• Marine mammals: Harbor seals, sea lions, and occasionally whales

• Sharks: Including great white sharks that pass through the strait

• Plankton: Microscopic organisms that form the base of the food chain

Concerns include:

• Strike risk: Marine animals could be injured or killed by turbine blades

• Pressure changes: Rapid pressure drops near turbines could harm fish

• Habitat disruption: Turbine structures could alter benthic (seafloor) habitats

• Flow alteration: Large-scale turbine arrays could modify tidal patterns and sediment transport

• Water quality: Sediment buildup could impair water quality in the Bay

Energy Output Limitations

Tidal power is what engineers call a "peaky resource"—it only generates during periods of strong tidal flow, roughly 16 hours per day. During the approximately 8 hours when tides are changing (slack water periods), power generation drops significantly or stops entirely. This intermittency requires:

• Energy storage systems (batteries) to smooth out supply

• Backup generation capacity for slack periods

• Grid integration systems to manage variable output

These requirements add significant cost and complexity to tidal energy systems, reducing their economic competitiveness.

Looking Forward: Is There Still Hope?

Despite these challenges, tidal energy at the Golden Gate isn't necessarily a dead concept. Several factors could revive interest:

Technological Advances

Marine energy technology continues to evolve. New designs promise:

• Lower costs through improved materials and manufacturing

• Better corrosion resistance using advanced coatings and materials

• Fish-friendly designs with slower-moving blades or alternative capture methods

• Easier installation and maintenance procedures

• Higher efficiency power conversion systems

Government Support and Climate Urgency

The U.S. Department of Energy is investing in marine energy research, with $25 million allocated for wave energy testing facilities in Oregon. As the climate crisis intensifies and California faces challenges meeting its aggressive renewable energy goals, previously "too expensive" options may become more attractive.

Lessons from Other Locations

Tidal energy projects in other parts of the world—particularly in Scotland, France, and Canada—have demonstrated that commercial tidal energy is possible. These projects provide valuable data on costs, environmental impacts, and technical challenges that could inform future attempts at the Golden Gate.

Hybrid Approaches

Rather than a massive single installation, future efforts might focus on:

• Small demonstration projects to prove technology and assess impacts

• Multiple smaller installations at different Bay locations (such as Raccoon Strait)

• Integration with other renewable sources (solar, wind, geothermal) for more stable output

• Combining tidal energy with other marine infrastructure projects

Conclusion: A Dream Deferred, Not Abandoned

The tidal energy potential of the Golden Gate Strait remains one of the most tantalizing renewable energy opportunities in the United States. The sheer scale of water movement—390 billion gallons twice daily, flowing at speeds up to 6 knots—represents an enormous, predictable, and clean energy resource. Under ideal conditions, it could generate enough electricity to power San Francisco and beyond.

However, the gap between theoretical potential and practical reality remains substantial. The challenges are real and significant: high costs, technical difficulties, environmental concerns, and the intermittent nature of tidal energy all conspire to keep this resource tantalizingly out of reach with current technology and economics.

The history of renewable energy teaches us that technologies once dismissed as impractical can become mainstream with the right combination of innovation, investment, and urgency. Wind and solar energy followed this path. Perhaps tidal energy will too.

For now, the powerful currents beneath the Golden Gate Bridge remain unharnessed, a sleeping giant of clean energy waiting for the day when technology, economics, and environmental stewardship can successfully converge. The water continues its eternal dance with the moon and sun, carrying within its motion enough energy to light a city—if only we can figure out how to capture it sustainably and affordably.

That day may still come. Until then, the Golden Gate stands as both a monument to human engineering achievement and a reminder of nature's power—power that flows relentlessly beneath it, 400 billion gallons at a time.

Key Facts: Golden Gate Tidal Energy

Water Flow:

• 390 billion gallons per tidal cycle

• ~780 billion gallons per day (two tidal cycles)

• 24% of Bay volume exchanges with each tide

Current Speeds:

• Average: 3-4.8 knots (3.5-5.5 mph)

• Maximum: 6+ knots (7+ mph) during peak tides

• Influenced by lunar cycle, season, and weather

Energy Potential:

• Theoretical maximum: 1,500-2,000 megawatts

• San Francisco's need: ~800 megawatts peak demand

• Practical first phase: 30-100 megawatts likely

Economic Reality:

• $15 million per turbine (estimated)

• $750,000 annual maintenance per turbine

• Not currently commercially viable

Status:

• Multiple feasibility studies completed (2006-2008)

• No commercial projects built to date

• Technology continues to develop globally

• Renewed interest possible as costs decline

Sources and Further Reading

• Electric Power Research Institute (2006). San Francisco Bay Tidal Energy Assessment

• San Francisco Public Utilities Commission (2008). Tidal Power Feasibility Study

• U.S. Geological Survey. "Under the Golden Gate Bridge - Views of the Sea Floor Near the Entrance to San Francisco Bay"

• Bay Nature Magazine. "Rivers in the Bay" (2018)

• KQED. "California Needs Renewable Energy. Could We Harness the Power of the Ocean?" (2024)

• NBC News. "San Francisco to test tides for energy" (2003)

• CalMatters. "Will ocean waves be California's new source of clean energy?" (2023)

https://earthmaintenancesolutions.com/hydro-tidal-power